(survivors) and group 2 (nonsurvivors). Firstly, the
risk factor were evaluated using the binary
modelKazantseva, Anastasiya,
Davydova, Yuliya,
Enikeeva, Renata,
Mustafin, Rustam,
Malykh, Sergey,
Lobaskova, Marina,
Kanapin, Alexander,
Prokopenko, Inga,
Khusnutdinova, Elza (2023) -specific effect estimates in such
modeling is important for individual
risk assessment. © 2023 by the authors.
Yalaev, Bulat,
Tyurin, Anton,
Prokopenko, Inga,
Karunas, Aleksandra,
Khusnutdinova, Elza,
Khusainova, Rita (2022) models to predict the
risk of low fractures in women from the Volga-Ural region of Russia with efficacy
-37 weeks were used as input data. Cox’s proportional hazards
model was used as a survival tool. Findings
Timasheva, Y.,
Balkhiyarova, Z.,
Avzaletdinova, D.,
Rassoleeva, I.,
Morugova, T.V.,
Korytina, G.,
Prokopenko, I.,
Kochetova, O. (2023) ability of the
model containing polygenic scores for the variants associated with T2D in our dataset
Tao, Pan,
Galiullin, D,
Chen, X.L.,
Zhang, W.H.,
Yang, K,
Liu, K,
Zhao, L.Y.,
Chen, X.Z.,
Hu, J.K. (2021) performed to determine
risk factors for ASBO. A nomogram for the prediction of ASBO was generated using
Savelieva, Olga,
Karunas, Alexandra,
Prokopenko, Inga,
Balkhiyarova, Zhanna,
Gilyazova, Irina,
Khidiyatova, Irina,
Khusnutdinova, Elza (2025) and respective response to drug therapy. PGS
models could help to predict the individual
risk of asthma using 26
Timasheva, Yanina,
Kochetova, Olga,
Balkhiyarova, Zhanna,
Korytina, Gulnaz,
Prokopenko, Inga,
Nouwen, Arie (2025) , we evaluated the prognostic capability of a polygenic score
model for MetS
risk, both independently