Воробьев В. А., Белобородов В. А., Шевченко Ю. В. Оценка эффективности протокола ускоренного выздоровления при лапароскопической пластике мочеточника и лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2023;18(2):9-19.
1. Krajewski, W. Hydronephrosis in the course of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: An underestimated problem? Current opinions on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment / W. Krajewski, J. Wojciechowska, J. Dembowski [и др.] // Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine: Official Organ Wroclaw Medical University. – 2017. – Т. 26. – Hydronephrosis in the course of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. – № 5. – С. 857-864. DOI: 10.17219/acem/59509.
2. Weitz, M. Primary non-surgical management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review / M. Weitz, M. Schmidt, G. Laube // Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany). – 2017. – Т. 32. – Primary non-surgical management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. – № 12. – С. 2203-2213. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3566-3.
3. Woodward, M. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis / M. Woodward, D. Frank // BJU international. – 2002. – Т. 89. – № 2. – С. 149-156. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.woodward.2578.x.
4. Комяков, Б.К. Лапароскопическая пластика при первичных сужениях пиелоуретерального сегмента / Б.К. Комяков, Б.Г. Гулиев, Р.В. Алиев // Урология. – 2013. – № 6. – С. 81-84.
5. Гулиев, Б.Г. Лапароскопическая пиелопластика при рецидивной стриктуре пиелоуретерального сегмента / Б.Г. Гулиев // Урология. – 2019. – Т. 4. – С. 16-19. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2019.4.16-19.
6. Sunaryo, P.L. Ureteral Strictures Following Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Population-based Assessment / P.L. Sunaryo, P.C. May, S.K. Holt [и др.] // The Journal of Urology. – 2022. – Т. 208. – Ureteral Strictures Following Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease. – № 6. – С. 1268-1275. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002929.
7. Elliott, S.P. Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic / S.P. Elliott, J.W. McAninch // The Urologic Clinics of North America. – 2006. – Т. 33. – Ureteral injuries. – № 1. – С. 55-66, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2005.11.005.
8. Khan, F. Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults / F. Khan, K. Ahmed, N. Lee [и др.] // Nature Reviews. Urology. – 2014. – Т. 11. – № 11. – С. 629-638. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.240.
9. Burks, F.N. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury / F.N. Burks, R.A. Santucci // Therapeutic Advances in Urology. – 2014. – Т. 6. – № 3. – С. 115-124. DOI: 10.1177/1756287214526767.
10. Wenske, S. Outcomes of distal ureteral reconstruction through reimplantation with psoas hitch, Boari flap, or ureteroneocystostomy for benign or malignant ureteral obstruction or injury / S. Wenske, C.A. Olsson, M.C. Benson // Urology. – 2013. – Т. 82. – № 1. – С. 231-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.046.
11. Preston, J.M. Iatrogenic ureteric injury: common medicolegal pitfalls / J.M. Preston // BJU international. – 2000. – Т. 86. – Iatrogenic ureteric injury. – № 3. – С. 313-317. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00100.x.
12. Rickard, M. Evolving trends in peri-operative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: working towards quicker recovery and day surgery pyeloplasty / M. Rickard, M. Chua, J. Dos Santos [и др.] // World Journal of Urology. – 2022. – Evolving trends in peri-operative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03925-w.
13. Rickard, M. Evolving trends in peri-operative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: working towards quicker recovery and day surgery pyeloplasty / M. Rickard, M. Chua, J.K. Kim [и др.] // World Journal of Urology. – 2021. – Т. 39. – Evolving trends in perioperative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction. – № 9. – С. 3677-3684. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03621-9.
14. Ekin, R.G. An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction / R.G. Ekin, O. Celik, Y.O. Ilbey // Central European Journal of Urology. – 2015. – Т. 68. – № 2. – С. 245-251. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2015.543.
15. Гулиев, Б.Г. Осложнения лапароскопической пиелопластики по классификации Клавьена / Б.Г. Гулиев, Р.В. Алиев // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 47-51.
16. Uhlig, A. Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - a systematic review and network meta-analysis / A. Uhlig, J. Uhlig, L. Trojan [и др.] // BMC urology. – 2019. – Т. 19. – № 1. – С. 112. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0544-7.
17. Zhu, W. Initial experiences with preoperative three-dimensional image reconstruction technology in laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction / W. Zhu, S. Xiong, C. Xu [и др.] // Translational Andrology and Urology. – 2021. – Т. 10. – № 11. – С. 4142-4151. DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-590.
18. Gao, B. Comparative analysis of suturing technique in pediatric pyeloplasty on surgical outcomes / B. Gao, W. Farhat, F. Zu’bi [и др.] // Pediatric Surgery International. – 2021. – Т. 37. – № 11. – С. 1633-1637. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-021-04960-9.
19. Nayyar, R. Ureter-first Approach and Reduction of Pelvis: Standardizing Handling of Ureteropelvic Junction During Pyeloplasty / R. Nayyar, P. Kumar, S. Panaiyadiyan, A. Seth // Urology. – 2021. – Ureter-first Approach and Reduction of Pelvis. – С. S0090-4295(21)01070-0. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.030.
20. Morsi, H.A. Renal pelvis reduction during dismembered pyeloplasty: is it necessary? / H.A. Morsi, K. Mursi, A.Y. Abdelaziz [и др.] // Journal of Pediatric Urology. – 2013. – Т. 9. – Renal pelvis reduction during dismembered pyeloplasty. – № 3. – С. 303-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.03.002.
21. Farouk, A. Fibrin glue as a sealant in stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A randomised controlled trial / A. Farouk, A. Tawfick, M. Reda [и др.] // Arab Journal of Urology. – 2019. – Т. 17. – Fibrin glue as a sealant in stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty. – № 3. – С. 228-233. DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1611990.
22. Pérez-Lanzac, A. Minilaparoscopy in urology: Systematic review / A. Pérez-Lanzac, R. García-Baquero // Actas Urologicas Espanolas. – 2018. – Т. 42. – Minilaparoscopy in urology. – № 5. – С. 299-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.008.
23. Danuser, H. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study / H. Danuser, C. Germann, N. Pelzer [и др.] // BJU international. – 2014. – Т. 113. – One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty. – № 6. – С. 931-935. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12652.
24. Abdelwahab, M. One week stenting after pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty; is it enough? / M. Abdelwahab, A. Abdelaziz, W. Aboulela [и др.] // Journal of Pediatric Urology. – 2020. – Т. 16. – № 1. – С. 98.e1-98.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.016.
25. Dagorno, C. Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis / C. Dagorno, L. Montalva, L. Ali и др. // Journal of Pediatric Surgery. – 2021. – Т. 56. – Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children. – № 12. – С. 2157-2164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.04.004.
26. Feldheiser, A. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice / A. Feldheiser, O. Aziz, G. Baldini и др. // Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. – 2016. – Т. 60. – Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2. – № 3. – С. 289-334. DOI: 10.1111/aas.12651.
27. Глыбочко, П.В. Осложнения Лапароскопической Пиелопластики / П.В. Глыбочко, Ю.Г. Аляев, В.А. Григорян [и др.] // Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. – 2017. – Т. 12. – № 3 (69). – С. 24-29.
28. Павлов, В.Н. Случай реконструкции неоуретероцистоанастомоза по поводу протяженной стриктуры мочеточника у пациента с трансплантированной почкой / В.Н. Павлов, А.Р. Загитов, Р.Р. Нуриахметов [и др.] // Медицинский Вестник Башкортостана. – 2020. – Т. 15. – № 5 (89). – С. 12-17.
