<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
 <records>
  <record>
   <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
   <contributors>
    <authors>
     <author>Chris Ho‑Ming Wong</author>
     <author>Ivan Ching‑Ho Ko</author>
     <author>David Ka‑Wai Leung</author>
     <author>Kang Liu</author>
     <author>Hongda Zhao</author>
     <author>Steven Leung</author>
     <author>Pilar Laguna</author>
     <author>Jean de la Rosette</author>
     <author>Jeremy Yuen‑Chun Teoh</author>
    </authors>
   </contributors>
   <titles>
    <title>Radical Nephroureterectomy Pentafecta as a Predictor of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Outcomes Following Radical Surgery</title>
   </titles>
   <keywords>
    <keyword>upper tract urothelial carcinoma</keyword>
    <keyword>nephroureterectomy</keyword>
    <keyword>survival outcomes</keyword>
    <keyword>quality-of-care&#13;
metrics</keyword>
    <keyword>pentafecta</keyword>
    <keyword>Scopus</keyword>
    <keyword>Web of Science</keyword>
    <keyword>Белый список</keyword>
   </keywords>
   <dates>
    <year>2026</year>
    <pub-dates>
     <date>2026-06-07</date>
    </pub-dates>
   </dates>
   <doi>10.1245/s10434-025-18411-5</doi>
   <journal>ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY</journal>
   <abstract>Introduction. Combined criteria have been used in many&#13;
facets of urologic surgical care in the management of urological cancer. We aimed to validate the prognostic ability of&#13;
a pentafecta related to the outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).&#13;
Patients and Methods.  Data were obtained from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial&#13;
Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) registry, a&#13;
prospective multinational database. Non-metastatic UTUC&#13;
patients treated with RNU were included. We adopted a pentafecta criteria of (1) negative surgical margin; (2) en bloc&#13;
resection of the bladder cuff; (3) absence of major complications; (4) template-based lymph node dissection performed&#13;
per European Association of Urology guidelines; and (5)&#13;
absence of recurrence (urothelial and/or distant recurrence)&#13;
within 12 months. Outcomes were pentafecta achievement&#13;
rates and oncological outcomes, including overall survival&#13;
(OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier&#13;
survival analyses with log-rank were performed on survival&#13;
outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to&#13;
identify confounders, and logistic regression was performed&#13;
to identify factors that confounded the pentafecta achievement rate.&#13;
Results.  Overall, 1049 cases were analyzed, and pentafecta was achieved in 504 patients (48.0%). Baseline&#13;
characteristics were comparable between those who achieved&#13;
pentafecta versus those who did not. Pentafecta achievement was associated with OS advantage (hazard ratio&#13;
[HR] 0.586, p = 0.024) and RFS advantage (HR 0.291,&#13;
p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified&#13;
that only pentafecta achievement and advanced T stage were&#13;
independent predictors of RFS and OS. A ureteric location&#13;
(compared with pelvicalyceal tumor) (odds ratio [OR] 0.424,&#13;
p = 0.002), multifocality (OR 0.191, p &lt; 0.001) and open&#13;
RNU (OR 0.661, p = 0.010) were predictors of pentafecta&#13;
non-achievement.&#13;
Conclusion. We validated a pentafecta that gauged surgical quality for RNU. Quality-of-care metrics should be promoted to unify surgical outcomes in UTUC management.</abstract>
   <urls>
    <web-urls>
     <url>https://repo.bashgmu.ru/publication/5496</url>
    </web-urls>
    <pdf-urls>
     <url>https://repo.bashgmu.ru/files/5690</url>
    </pdf-urls>
   </urls>
  </record>
 </records>
</xml>
