<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
 <records>
  <record>
   <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
   <contributors>
    <authors>
     <author>Starshinova, A.An.</author>
     <author>Sabirova, A.</author>
     <author>Koroteeva, O.</author>
     <author>Kudryavtsev, I.</author>
     <author>Rubinstein, A.</author>
     <author>Aquino, A.</author>
     <author>Trulioff, A.S.</author>
     <author>Belyaeva, E.</author>
     <author>Kulpina, A.</author>
     <author>Sharipov, R.A.</author>
     <author>Tukfatullin, R.K.</author>
     <author>Nikolenko, N.Y.</author>
     <author>Mikhalev, A.</author>
     <author>Savchenko, A.A.</author>
     <author>Borisov, A.</author>
     <author>Kudlay, D.</author>
    </authors>
   </contributors>
   <titles>
    <title>Detection for New Biomarkers of Tuberculosis Infection Activity Using Machine Learning Methods</title>
   </titles>
   <keywords>
    <keyword>latent tuberculosis infection</keyword>
    <keyword>preclinical stage</keyword>
    <keyword>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</keyword>
    <keyword>immune&#13;
biomarkers</keyword>
    <keyword>interferon signature</keyword>
    <keyword>extracellular vesicles</keyword>
    <keyword>transcriptomics</keyword>
    <keyword>immunodiagnostics</keyword>
    <keyword>PET/CT imaging</keyword>
    <keyword>multidrug-resistant tuberculosis</keyword>
    <keyword>Scopus</keyword>
    <keyword>Web of Science</keyword>
    <keyword>Белый список</keyword>
   </keywords>
   <dates>
    <year>2026</year>
    <pub-dates>
     <date>2026-06-06</date>
    </pub-dates>
   </dates>
   <doi>10.3390/diseases14020066</doi>
   <journal>DISEASES</journal>
   <abstract>Background/Objectives: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) represents a critical reservoir&#13;
for subsequent development of active tuberculosis (ATB) and poses significant challenges&#13;
for early diagnosis and disease prevention. Traditional immunological assays, such as&#13;
interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), are limited in their ability to reliably distinguish&#13;
LTBI from ATB. Recent advances in high-throughput omics technologies and machine&#13;
learning (ML) approaches offer new opportunities for precise, biomarker-based differential&#13;
diagnostics. Methods: Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of host immune responses&#13;
has revealed reproducible gene and protein signatures associated with LTBI and ATB.&#13;
The integration of ML techniques—including feature selection, dimensionality reduction,&#13;
multimodal learning, and explainable AI—facilitates the construction of robust diagnostic&#13;
models. Single-modality signatures, derived from RNA-seq, microarrays, or proteomic&#13;
assays, are complemented by multimodal approaches that incorporate soluble mediators,&#13;
immunological readouts, and imaging-derived features. Deep learning frameworks, such&#13;
as convolutional neural networks and transformer-based architectures, enhance the extraction of complex molecular and structural patterns from high-dimensional datasets.&#13;
Results: ML-driven analyses of transcriptomic and proteomic data consistently outperform&#13;
conventional immunological tests in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applicability. Multimodal integration further improves diagnostic accuracy and robustness.&#13;
These advances support the translational development of concise, quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)-based biomarker panels suitable for routine clinical application,&#13;
enabling early and reliable differentiation between LTBI and ATB. Overall, the combination of high-throughput omics and AI-based analytical frameworks provides a promising&#13;
pathway for enhancing global tuberculosis diagnostics. Conclusions: This review provides&#13;
a structured and critical synthesis of transcriptomic and proteomic biomarker research for LTBI and ATB discrimination, with a particular emphasis on machine learning–based&#13;
analytical frameworks. Unlike previous narrative reviews, we systematically compare&#13;
data-generating platforms, modelling strategies, validation approaches, and sources of&#13;
heterogeneity across studies. We further identify key translational barriers, including&#13;
cohort homogeneity, platform dependency, and limited external validation, and propose&#13;
directions for future research aimed at improving clinical applicability.</abstract>
   <urls>
    <web-urls>
     <url>https://repo.bashgmu.ru/publication/5482</url>
    </web-urls>
    <pdf-urls>
     <url>https://repo.bashgmu.ru/files/5676</url>
    </pdf-urls>
   </urls>
  </record>
 </records>
</xml>
