RT - Article
SR - Electronic
T1 - 
SP - 2025-02-17
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00674-0
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
A1 - , 
YR - 2025
UL - https://repo.bashgmu.ru/publication/4523
AB - Background: In the ARIEL4 trial of rucaparib versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with relapsed BRCA-mutated ovarian carcinoma, the primary endpoint was met, showing improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival with rucaparib. Here, we present the final overall survival analysis of the trial and other post-progression outcomes. Methods: This open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial was done at 64 hospitals and cancer centres in 12 countries, including Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were women aged 18 or older with BRCA1 or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma and had received at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. Patients had to have evaluable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive response technology and block randomisation (block size of six) and stratified by progression-free interval after the most recent platinum-containing therapy to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily administered in 28-day cycles) or chemotherapy on the basis of platinum-sensitivity status. In the chemotherapy group, patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression-free interval ≥1 to