<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
 <records>
  <record>
   <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
   <contributors>
    <authors>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
     <author></author>
    </authors>
   </contributors>
   <titles>
    <title></title>
   </titles>
   <dates>
    <year>2020</year>
    <pub-dates>
     <date>2020-12-19</date>
    </pub-dates>
   </dates>
   <doi>10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126486</doi>
   <abstract>The paper concerns a choice in the biofunctionalization of the coatings produced by plasma electrolytic oxidation: either with inorganic components by introducing Ca-, P- containing compounds into the coating (primarily hydroxyapatite), or with integrin-active organic components (primarily RGD peptides). The following coatings were analyzed: E1 – titania PEO coating, E2 – titania and Ca-, P containing PEO coating, E1 + RGD – titania PEO coating modified with integrin-active RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) tripeptide sequence anchored to the surface with a bisphosphonate linker. In terms of wear resistance, electrochemical corrosion behavior, and interaction with osteoblast-like cells, coating E1 + RGD seems to be the most promising for the titanium implants.</abstract>
   <urls>
    <web-urls>
     <url>https://repo.bashgmu.ru/publication/1070</url>
    </web-urls>
    <pdf-urls>
     <url>https://repo.bashgmu.ru/files/1226</url>
    </pdf-urls>
   </urls>
  </record>
 </records>
</xml>
